Page 2 of 2

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:19 pm
by 1 2many
:text-+1: yep but he doesn't have copper.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:30 pm
by jacobraven
sp0rk wrote:
jacobraven wrote:Metho is just 95% ethanol 5% methanol essential the reason you remove foreshots to rid the wood alcohol. The poison is methanol.

If you're buying Digger's metho (it's what most places in Aus sell), as per my link to their MSDS it's only ethanol and water


Yer was just talking to a mate who is a chemistry major most using bittering agent(Denatonium) now not methanol as it wasnt working as a deterant

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:31 pm
by hoochlover
woodduck wrote:Why are you buying metho? Don't we produce it every time we run the still? I've got that much methanol/ heads I don't know what to do with it :wtf:


I put that in first. I only had 2 litres of my own heads. So I used the metho to top it up. I'm sure if I had enough years behind me the concept of buying metho would be pointless too, hehe :)

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:33 pm
by hoochlover
1 2many wrote:The one down side to this SSP is that it won't be any good for removing sulphides. ;-)


You need sulphides in the wash to be able strip sulphides out with copper in the first place. I entertain myself with translated russian distilling forums because I think they produce the best home made vodka and most of the more experienced guys I have read don't use copper. But if I do need copper it's easy to just put some mesh in at the top or bottom, no biggie.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 5:18 pm
by 1 2many
Can you tell me how you make your washes with out sulphides in them :think:

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:26 pm
by RuddyCrazy
OK not related to this thread but on sulfides, a mate who who is in the food trade asked he could have 100ml of my vodka to do some tests on it. A month later he came around with an empty bottle saying they found nothing harmful in my double pot stilled 85% TPW and when the guys found the results they all had a drink. They did say they had tested several vodka's and the impurities in them they found were above safety limits. As they said.
One of the guys called me and I'm sure has since bought a still off Mac.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:49 pm
by hoochlover
1 2many wrote:Can you tell me how you make your washes with out sulphides in them :think:


You can make washes low in sulphides, I don't think sugar washes are laden with it and I only want to make neutrals. As to the detection rate of sulphides in a good wash vs the copper flavor, maybe it's personal taste. Not sure yet.

Personally I really dislike the copper taste I got when distilling water in the copper rig I have, which means that even if I'm at 96% purity, 4% remaining water has some copper in it. I don't have the alcohol taste buds developed enough like a lot of people here...... and I couldn't taste copper in my alcohol from same rig, but I could in the water.

Knowing what I know about copper and that it is very there in distilled water, if I can remove it's use I will seek that. I can only really finding out by removing its use in a batch and seeing what happens. I'm still trying to find the fermentation setup I want to commit to.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:52 pm
by Sam.
hoochlover wrote:
1 2many wrote:Can you tell me how you make your washes with out sulphides in them :think:


You can make washes low in sulphides, I don't think sugar washes are laden with it and I only want to make neutrals. As to the detection rate of sulphides in a good wash vs the copper flavor, maybe it's personal taste. Not sure yet.

Personally I really dislike the copper taste I got when distilling water in the copper rig I have, which means that even if I'm at 96% purity, 4% remaining water has some copper in it. I don't have the alcohol taste buds developed enough like a lot of people here...... and I couldn't taste copper in my alcohol from same rig, but I could in the water.

Knowing what I know about copper and that it is very there in distilled water, if I can remove it's use I will seek that. I can only really finding out by removing its use in a batch and seeing what happens. I'm still trying to find the fermentation setup I want to commit to.


So you don't mind the rotten egg smell from a TPW with no copper in the still?

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:54 pm
by hoochlover
Sam. wrote:So you don't mind the rotten egg smell from a TPW with no copper in the still?


I haven't used a non copper still yet mate, so can't tell you. :) My SS rig still needs a boiler solution. I was going to use my 2KW boiler but apparently it's not powerful enough for a 3 inch SPP rig so I have to come up with some new way.

In regards to hydrogen sulfide, some test washes I have done smell way more stinky just after finishing and it goes after a little time. It's possible that degassing a sugar wash removes most of the sulphides. When it comes to brown spirits it could be a lot different, I really don't have much experience or knowledge on that topic unless it overlaps the neutral subject.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 7:57 pm
by Sam.
Well mate you might want to wait before posting results from things that you haven't actually done.

Obviously the stilling bug has bit you hard but you might want to slow up a bit :handgestures-thumbupleft:

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:00 pm
by hoochlover
Sam. wrote:Well mate you might want to wait before posting results from things that you haven't actually done.

Obviously the stilling bug has bit you hard but you might want to slow up a bit :handgestures-thumbupleft:


What results did I post prematurely? :)

I have opinions on certain things but I try not to post results or form strong conclusions unless there is strong enough evidence. I want to try copper free because that is what the best russians do so I'm going to copy them and see if it works.It's possible it may not, maybe Russians don't have the sulfide sensor in their tongue or something. ;)

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:06 pm
by Sam.
hoochlover wrote:
Sam. wrote:Well mate you might want to wait before posting results from things that you haven't actually done.

Obviously the stilling bug has bit you hard but you might want to slow up a bit :handgestures-thumbupleft:


What results did I post prematurely? :)

I have opinions on certain things but I try not to post results or form strong conclusions unless there is strong enough evidence. I want to try copper free because that is what the best russians do so I'm going to copy them and see if it works.It's possible it may not, maybe Russians don't have the sulfide sensor in their tongue or something. ;)


Your opinions would seem to be coming across as bare fact that you have experienced, maybe its just me getting that vibe...

I really do think everyone should try running copper free because you will only ever do it once :puke-huge:

Also based on some of the vodkas I have drank I wouldn't consider most russians to enjoy the best tipple available ;-)

And again if SPP was the very best way of doing it i'm sure every forum on the web would be talking it up and everyone would be using it, including every commercial vodka distiller...

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:02 pm
by bayshine
Have to agree with Sam on this one :handgestures-thumbupleft:
All distilled water tastes like crap to me and they say its due to no oxygen in it
My neutral always had a slight metallic taste with staino scrubers to me but when I went to mac's copper mesh its never taste better :handgestures-thumbupleft:

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:43 pm
by hoochlover
bayshine wrote:Have to agree with Sam on this one :handgestures-thumbupleft:
All distilled water tastes like crap to me and they say its due to no oxygen in it
My neutral always had a slight metallic taste with staino scrubers to me but when I went to mac's copper mesh its never taste better :handgestures-thumbupleft:


Yeah well I can't really detect it in my Vodka I made through the same still but it's extremely easy to taste it in the water. You guys with copper rigs should try distilling some water and seeing how it tastes. :) It could just be my still, who knows. I've only tried one copper distillation unit.

There is a lot of evidence that copper helps removes hydrogen sulfide in the distillation process. I'm not denying that at all. And maybe for brown spirits a copper still is the best when it comes to taste, I have no idea. For me personally, just me and my neutral desire, if I can find a way to not use copper at all by removing the hydrogen sulfide another way I will be happy.

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:43 am
by Whiskyaugogo
hoochlover wrote:
bayshine wrote:Have to agree with Sam on this one :handgestures-thumbupleft:
All distilled water tastes like crap to me and they say its due to no oxygen in it
My neutral always had a slight metallic taste with staino scrubers to me but when I went to mac's copper mesh its never taste better :handgestures-thumbupleft:


Yeah well I can't really detect it in my Vodka I made through the same still but it's extremely easy to taste it in the water. You guys with copper rigs should try distilling some water and seeing how it tastes. :) It could just be my still, who knows. I've only tried one copper distillation unit.

There is a lot of evidence that copper helps removes hydrogen sulfide in the distillation process. I'm not denying that at all. And maybe for brown spirits a copper still is the best when it comes to taste, I have no idea. For me personally, just me and my neutral desire, if I can find a way to not use copper at all by removing the hydrogen sulfide another way I will be happy.


There is a way, read the facts and listen to the experienced people on here! :angry-banghead:

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2015 8:18 am
by Darwin award
are you sure you're not getting a copper taste because the bicarb you use in your low wines is liberating small amounts copper from your still, which is flushed through on your "water only" runs?

I must say as a NOOB I've been reading lots and lots and doing a fair bit also..every chance I get..and the one thing that has never failed me is following the advice + the recipes in the tried + proven section and listeninmg to the guys here who know their stuff, If you're going to test and experiment (which is a worthy thing I believe) make sure you are testing one variable at a time....maybe one thing you are doing is inadvertently changing something else...IDK...as I said, I'm a NOOB, but on reading the last couple of threads and reading up elsewhere, I'll probably not be going for SPP or putting Bi-carb in my low-wines.....but that's just me

Re: My Spiral Prismatic Packing (SPP) arrived

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2015 9:45 am
by WTDist
from home distiller
read about bicarb etc
Ken recommends using Sodium Carbonate to reduce the amount of fusel oils present ..

.. try sodium carbonate @ 4.5 grams/ litre, add it when the wash temperatire is at 35-40 degrees C, add slowly then continue with your distillation in the normal manner. Sodium Carbonate is used in the production of soap and it combines with the oils to form a compound that does not evaporate at the normal distillation temperatures that we are using. Voila, cleaner spirit, less carbon treatment needed and more happy faces.


it wont evaporate ;-)
but if you ferment with it....
Mike warns though ..

It's OK to add baking soda or other alkali to a STRIPPED wash, but NEVER put it in the primary ferment and then distill. If you do, and your still contains ANY copper, you will severely corrode the copper, and get blue, ammonia-smelling distillate. Not fun!


Rob details the bicarb advantage too:

Assumptions and facts:
1. A well run column distillation will separate a mixture into fractions based on the boiling points of the components.
2. There will be some overlap in most real-life stills.
3. ethyl acetate can be smelled at very low concentrations
4. acetic acid cannot (it has a higher flavour threshold)
5. under neutral or acidic conditions acetic acid will esterify to some extent in the presence of ethanol.
6. sodium acetate is not volatile
7. sodium bicarbonate will neutralise acetic acid.
8. sodium bicarbonate may hydrolyse ethyl acetate to a greater or lesser extent.
9. Adding sodium bicarbonate at some point between a stripping run and final distillation has the effect of decreasing the volume of fractions collected which smell of ethyl acetate.
10. Adding sodium bicarbonate at some point between a stripping run and final distillation has the effect of making the main fraction "cleaner smelling"
11. without bicarb the main fraction _can_ smell of ethyl acetate (ymmv)
12. Sodium acetate is not esterified by ethanol.

Questions:
1. Why is there ethyl acetate in the fractions after the heads? (no NaHCO3)
2. What does NaHCO3 addition do?
3. How do we best (read easiest) use it?

Rob's Answers/Opinions (currently!):
1. During distillation (after column stabilization) ethyl acetate is being formed in the boiler/column. This is why it continues to be present even after heads removal. (see assumptions 1, 5, 11)
2. Bicarb addition neuralises acetic acid, preventing ethyl acetate formation, distillation of acetic acid, and hence future esterification. (see assumptions 6, 7, 9, 10, 12)
3. Bicarb addition can hydrolyse ethyl acetate, thus decreasing it's quantity (see assumptions 8, 9)
4. There is actually a tiny amount of ethyl acetate about, but it is highly noticable (assumption 3). Using bicarb (as opposed to hydroxides) actually has a rather small effect on the amount of esters in the mix. What it does (primarily) is to prevent further formation, and hence allowing the still to do its job without the moving target of continually increasing ester concentrations in the boiler.
5. Based on this lot, adding bicarb at the start of the final distillation is sufficient, as neutralisation of acetic acid is instantaneous.