MartinCash wrote:I have a different take on it.
I consider the terms 'vodka' and 'neutral' to be different things.
Yes, modern vodkas are almost all (but NOT all) neutral. However, this wasn't always so and even some modern vodkas have subtle but recognisable grain flavour. I think the answer is that you can make vodka with a pot still, as long as you're prepared to tolerate some flavour contribution from the base fermentation. TFFV is one recipe that has great feedback for pot-stilled vodka, and I can back this up, as the grain flavour is very mild. You will get a better result if you triple-distil than double-distil, and you will clean it up some each time you dilute with water for the next distillation.
All that said, I don't think it's feasible to try to make something you can really call neutral (as opposed to vodka) from a pot still. The effort is hardly worth it.
I agree with this...
Traditional vodka was originally triple distilled with a pot still, making cuts and diluting with "tasteless" water for 2nd & 3rd distillations and then finally diluting to around 37.5% ABV. (Some countries specify a minimum of 40%) A good pot stilled vodka should only have a mild taste of the original substrate, with most distilleries preferring wheat due to it being relatively mellow compared to other substrates like rye, potato or molasses. Wheat is also comparatively cheaper. So, yes. You can make vodka with a pot still.
Neutral is different to vodka. It should not have any discernible taste at all. You could theoretically make a neutral with a pot still, but you would need to re-distill too many times for it to be practical. Neutral is also made to be used as a base for other spirits, such as gin or liqueurs - where the flavours are added (or distilled with) after the base spirit is made. A pot still is definitely not the best tool for this job, you'd be much better with a reflux column or plated still with a packed section.